Zombie Phishing  protezione Giacomo Lanzi

Zombie phishing: beware of emails, it could be zombies

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

Out of nowhere, someone replies to an email conversation dated months ago. This is a real conversation that actually happened. Maybe it’s about a meeting, a job opportunity. This email seems very relevant, but beware, it could be zombie phishing .

Indeed, something is wrong, the topic discussed has been over for months and now there is a strange error message in the body of the email. This is a sneaky tactic: revive a long dead email conversation.

zombie phishing

Not the usual phishing

The Cofense ™ Phishing Defense Center ™ (PDC) spotted a large Zombie Phishing campaign in 2018. The scam , like almost any phishing attack, is carried out through compromised email accounts.

Scammers take over an email account and respond to long-closed conversations with a phishing link or malicious attachment (e.g. malware or a keylogger ) . Since the email subject is usually relevant to the victim, a curiosity-driven click is very likely to occur . In fact, let’s not forget that the original conversation was already present in the messages received, it is easy to think that it is a follow up or similar.

These Zombie Phishing attacks appear to use automatically generated infection URLs to evade detection. No two links are alike, and they are hidden behind “error” messages without too many frills in the body of the message. This scenario provides a pattern of apparent legitimacy for the users who are victims.

The zombies in computer science

In the computer industry, a zombie is a compromised computer connected to the network. The compromised state could be due to a hacker, virus, malware, or trojan horse .

The infected machine performs malicious tasks under a remote direction. Zombie computer botnets are often used to spread email spam and launch denial-of-service (DoS) attacks.

Types of attack

Here are some observed patterns of Zombie Phishing carrying malicious links . A distinguishing factor was the use of two distinct graphic templates containing button or link error messages.

The message reads something like “Incomplete message” or “Inability to show the whole message”. The link or button invites you to click to see the original message. Obviously the click only involves the installation of a malware or other similar events . Note that no two identical links have been identified, a sign that probably a bot was generating the addresses.

Another common factor is the use of domains with the .icu TLD. This is probably a factor that varies considerably over time. Here are some of the domains found in the first analysis of 2018:

Zombie phishing - original domains
Fonte immagine Cofence™

These zombie phish attacks have been observed to use official organizational logos to add legitimacy to the fake login pages. A common practice in phishing techniques that we have already seen in other articles.

Landing pages are designed to look like a legitimate online portal, including a company logo and even a favicon. In these cases the ultimate goal is the theft of the victim’s credentials .

Furthermore, any victim who visits the malicious website is “tagged” using the host’s IP address as an identifier and, after entering the credentials, is directed to the same spam website seen by other victims. This is often done via obfuscated links using URL shorteners (such as hxxps://href[.]Li/).

If the same host tries to visit the phishing link again, the fake login page is skipped and you are forwarded directly to the spam page. This markup and URL shortener obfuscation helps attackers keep a low profile and continue their campaign unabated.

Conversation Hijacking

Zombie Phishing Protection

The conversation hijacking tactic is by no means new and is now living a new life with zombie phishing . Scammers have hijacked compromised email accounts to distribute malware and phishing emails as replies to conversations that have been concluded for years now.

This technique is still popular because it makes victims much more likely to click on links and download or open files. The threshold of attention against classic phishing attacks is lowered when messages are brought into conversations already in their inbox .

A couple of years old example of this was the botnet Geodo . Basically it is insertion into existing email threads ( conversation hijacking ) to deliver malicious documents. These, in turn, download a sample of Geodo or other malware such as Ursnif , which according to Key4Biz was the most widespread in Italy in June 2020.

However, the effectiveness of this tactic can greatly depend on the content of the conversations . A reply to an automated advertising email is less likely to cause an infection than a reply to a help-desk support thread.

There have been several Geodo zombie phishing campaigns consisting of replies to automated advertising emails. This is an indication that, in some cases, campaigns consist of indiscriminate replies to all emails in a mailbox. Since the volume of these conversation hijacking is still relatively low, the small reach of these emails is probably limited by the number of ongoing conversations .

Certain account types are therefore more likely to attract the direct attention of threat actors and induce them to invest additional effort and time in developing unique phishing campaigns for those accounts.

Defense from zombie-phishing

Here are some quick tips to avoid losing your credentials in a Zombie Phishing attack:

  • Beware of email subjects that may seem relevant but come from old conversations
  • Beware of any error message in the body of the message
  • Don’t trust attached documents just because they’re replying to a conversation
  • Hover your mouse over buttons or links in suspicious messages to check for suspicious domains

It has been observed that these campaigns have gotten smarter . To combat this and other forms of phishing, employee training is key.

A properly trained workforce is what it takes to defend your organization against Zombie Phishing attacks.

SOD offers a full service in this regard . We begin by attacking the company in a controlled manner, testing any weaknesses in employee safety or behavior. Subsequently, specific training is designed to remedy the gaps and fully train the staff.

To keep defenses high, our SOCaaS includes the analysis of user behavior, logs of connected machines and the network in a to immediately identify phishing attempts.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS darkreading

RSS Full Disclosure

  • Microsoft Warbird and PMP security research - technical doc December 3, 2024
    Posted by Security Explorations on Dec 03Hello All, We have released a technical document pertaining to our Warbird / PMP security research. It is available for download from this location: https://security-explorations.com/materials/wbpmp_doc.md.txt The document provides a more in-depth technical explanation, illustration and verification of discovered attacks affecting PlayReady on Windows 10 / 11 x64 and pertaining […]
  • Access Control in Paxton Net2 software December 3, 2024
    Posted by Jeroen Hermans via Fulldisclosure on Dec 02CloudAware Security Advisory [CVE pending]: Potential PII leak and incorrect access control in Paxton Net2 software ======================================================================== Summary ======================================================================== Insecure backend database in the Paxton Net2 software. Possible leaking of PII incorrect access control. No physical access to computer running Paxton Net2 is required....
  • SEC Consult SA-20241127-0 :: Stored Cross-Site Scripting in Omada Identity (CVE-2024-52951) November 27, 2024
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Nov 27SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20241127-0 > ======================================================================= title: Stored Cross-Site Scripting product: Omada Identity vulnerable version:
  • SEC Consult SA-20241125-0 :: Unlocked JTAG interface and buffer overflow in Siemens SM-2558 Protocol Element, Siemens CP-2016 & CP-2019 November 27, 2024
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Nov 27SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20241125-0 > ======================================================================= title: Unlocked JTAG interface and buffer overflow product: Siemens SM-2558 Protocol Element (extension module for Siemens SICAM AK3/TM/BC), Siemens CP-2016 & CP-2019 vulnerable version: JTAG: Unknown HW revision, Zynq Firmware...
  • Re: Local Privilege Escalations in needrestart November 27, 2024
    Posted by Mark Esler on Nov 27The security fix for CVE-2024-48991, 6ce6136 (“core: prevent race condition on /proc/$PID/exec evaluation”) [0], introduced a regression which was subsequently fixed 42af5d3 ("core: fix regression of false positives for processes running in chroot or mountns (#317)") [1]. Many thanks to Ivan Kurnosov and Salvatore Bonaccorso for their review. [0] […]
  • APPLE-SA-11-19-2024-5 macOS Sequoia 15.1.1 November 21, 2024
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Nov 21APPLE-SA-11-19-2024-5 macOS Sequoia 15.1.1 macOS Sequoia 15.1.1 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/121753. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. JavaScriptCore Available for: macOS Sequoia Impact: Processing maliciously crafted […]
  • Local Privilege Escalations in needrestart November 21, 2024
    Posted by Qualys Security Advisory via Fulldisclosure on Nov 21Qualys Security Advisory LPEs in needrestart (CVE-2024-48990, CVE-2024-48991, CVE-2024-48992, CVE-2024-10224, and CVE-2024-11003) ======================================================================== Contents ======================================================================== Summary Background CVE-2024-48990 (and CVE-2024-48992) CVE-2024-48991 CVE-2024-10224 (and CVE-2024-11003) Mitigation Acknowledgments Timeline I got bugs...
  • APPLE-SA-11-19-2024-4 iOS 17.7.2 and iPadOS 17.7.2 November 21, 2024
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Nov 21APPLE-SA-11-19-2024-4 iOS 17.7.2 and iPadOS 17.7.2 iOS 17.7.2 and iPadOS 17.7.2 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/121754. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. JavaScriptCore Available for: iPhone XS […]
  • APPLE-SA-11-19-2024-3 iOS 18.1.1 and iPadOS 18.1.1 November 21, 2024
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Nov 21APPLE-SA-11-19-2024-3 iOS 18.1.1 and iPadOS 18.1.1 iOS 18.1.1 and iPadOS 18.1.1 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/121752. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. JavaScriptCore Available for: iPhone XS […]
  • APPLE-SA-11-19-2024-2 visionOS 2.1.1 November 21, 2024
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Nov 21APPLE-SA-11-19-2024-2 visionOS 2.1.1 visionOS 2.1.1 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/121755. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. JavaScriptCore Available for: Apple Vision Pro Impact: Processing maliciously crafted web […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}