deception technology Piergiorgio Venuti

Deception: Tricking Hackers to Secure Your Network

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

Deception: Comparison with Hackers on Their Ground

“We pay hackers their own coin by using the same defenses and techniques that malware uses against computer systems by modeling the attackers’ decision-making process.”

Introduction to Deception

Deception is a proactive cybersecurity approach that uses traps or decoys to trick attackers into revealing their presence. By transforming the computer system into a minefield of digital traps, Deception disrupts the decision-making process of attackers, exposing their tactics, techniques and procedures.

One of the leading Deception service providers is Secure Online Desktop. This company offers an Active Defense Deception solution that provides a highly interactive deception network designed to deceive and detect attackers.

The Secure Online Desktop Active Defense Deception Service

Secure Online Desktop’s Active Defense Deception service creates a simulated network environment that tricks attackers into thinking they have compromised a system. This environment consists of a variety of digital “decoys” or “decoys” that simulate real computer systems.

The Secure Online Desktop solution also uses advanced deception techniques such as the use of fake credentials to lure attackers into traps. In addition, the service continuously monitors the network environment for any suspicious or abnormal activity. When an attack is detected, the system sends a real-time alert, providing details about the attacker and his tactics.

Deception in the Killchain: An Approach Based on the MITER Framework

Deception can be integrated into any stage of the killchain, as described in the MITER ATT&CK Framework.

First, in the “Reconnaissance” phase, Deception traps can feed false information to attackers, confusing their preliminary research. Later, during the “Weaponization” and “Delivery” phases, traps can simulate apparent vulnerabilities to attract attackers.

In the “Exploitation” and “Installation” phase, the attacker, thinking he has been successful, may try to install malware or perform other malicious actions, further revealing his intentions and tactics. Finally, during the “Command & Control” and “Actions on Objectives” phases, the deceiver can continue to monitor the attacker’s activity, providing valuable information to prevent future attacks.

Practical Cases of Success of Deception

Deception has proven to be effective in various real-world scenarios. Here are some examples:

  1. TrapX Security ↗: TrapX used Deception to stop a hospital ransomware attack. The attackers had been fooled by digital traps, allowing the security team to isolate and neutralize the threat.
  2. Illusive Networks ↗: Illusive used Deception to help a banking organization prevent a data theft. The attackers had attempted to access fake credentials, revealing their presence and allowing the security team to block the attack.
  3. Acalvio ↗: Acalvio ha utilizzato la Deception per bloccare un attacco di spear phishing in un’organizzazione di energia. The digital traps fooled the attackers, allowing the security team to identify and stop the attack.

The Integration of Deception with SOC Services

The Active Defense Detection service of the Secure Online Desktop can be combined with the services of a Security Operations Center (SOC) to further increase network security. A SOC provides a team of security experts who constantly monitor the network to detect and respond to any threats.

Integrating Deception with a SOC allows information gleaned from digital traps to be combined with other sources of security data to provide a more complete view of network activity. Additionally, the information collected by the Deception can be used to improve the detection and response capabilities of the SOC.

For example, if a trap detects an attack, the SOC can quickly isolate the affected part of the network and take steps to neutralize the threat. At the same time, the information about the attack can be used to update the SOC’s detection signatures and improve its ability to detect similar attacks in the future.

Conclusion

Deception represents a step forward in the fight against cyber attacks. With its ability to deceive attackers, monitor their actions, and provide valuable insight into their tactics, deception can be a key element of an effective cyber defense strategy.

Using Secure Online Desktop’s Active Defense Detection service, combined with a SOC, can provide an unprecedented level of security, protecting your network from increasingly sophisticated cyber-attacks.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS darkreading

RSS Full Disclosure

  • SEC Consult SA-20241009-0 :: Local Privilege Escalation via MSI installer in Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect (CVE-2024-9473) October 10, 2024
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Oct 09>
  • APPLE-SA-10-03-2024-1 iOS 18.0.1 and iPadOS 18.0.1 October 8, 2024
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Oct 07APPLE-SA-10-03-2024-1 iOS 18.0.1 and iPadOS 18.0.1 iOS 18.0.1 and iPadOS 18.0.1 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/121373. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. Media Session Available for: iPhone […]
  • Some SIM / USIM card security (and ecosystem) info October 4, 2024
    Posted by Security Explorations on Oct 04Hello All, Those interested in SIM / USIM card security might find some information at our spin-off project page dedicated to the topic potentially useful: https://security-explorations.com/sim-usim-cards.html We share there some information based on the experiences gained in the SIM / USIM card security space, all in a hope this […]
  • SEC Consult SA-20240930-0 :: Local Privilege Escalation via MSI Installer in Nitro PDF Pro (CVE-2024-35288) October 1, 2024
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Sep 30>
  • Backdoor.Win32.Benju.a / Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution September 29, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 28Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/88922242e8805bfbc5981e55fdfadd71.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Benju.a Vulnerability: Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution Family: Benju Type: PE32 MD5: 88922242e8805bfbc5981e55fdfadd71 SHA256: 7d34804173e09d0f378dfc8c9212fe77ff51f08c9d0b73d00a19b7045ddc1f0e Vuln ID: MVID-2024-0700...
  • Backdoor.Win32.Prorat.jz / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) September 29, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 28Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/277f9a4db328476300c4da5f680902ea.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Prorat.jz Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) Description: The RAT listens on TCP ports 51100,5112,5110 and runs an FTP service. Prorat uses a vulnerable component in a secondary malware […]
  • Backdoor.Win32.Amatu.a / Remote Arbitrary File Write (RCE) September 29, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 28Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/1e2d0b90ffc23e00b743c41064bdcc6b.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Amatu.a Vulnerability: Remote Arbitrary File Write (RCE) Family: Amatu Type: PE32 MD5: 1e2d0b90ffc23e00b743c41064bdcc6b SHA256: 77fff9931013ab4de6d4be66ca4fda47be37b6f706a7062430ee8133c7521297 Vuln ID: MVID-2024-0698 Dropped...
  • Backdoor.Win32.Agent.pw / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) September 29, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 28Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/68dd7df213674e096d6ee255a7b90088.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Agent.pw Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) Description: The malware listens on TCP port 21111. Third-party attackers who can reach an infected machine can send specially crafted sequential packetz […]
  • Backdoor.Win32.Boiling / Remote Command Execution September 29, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 28Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/80cb490e5d3c4205434850eff6ef5f8f.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Boiling Vulnerability: Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution Description: The malware listens on TCP port 4369. Third party adversaries who can reach an infected host, can issue single OS commands to […]
  • Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 88): a SINGLE command line shows about 20, 000 instances of CWE-73 September 29, 2024
    Posted by Stefan Kanthak on Sep 28Hi @ll, CWE-73: External Control of File Name or Path is a well-known and well-documented weakness. as well as demonstrate how to (ab)use just one instance of this weakness (introduced about 7 years ago with Microsoft Defender, so-called "security software") due to...

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}