Advanced Persistent Threat hacker Giacomo Lanzi

Advanced persistent threats (APTs): what they are and how to defend yourself

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

An advanced persistent threat (APT) is a broad term used to describe an attack campaign in which an intruder, or a group of intruders, establishes an illicit and long-term presence on a network in order to extract highly sensitive data. The targets of these assaults, which are chosen and studied with great care, typically include large corporations or government networks. The consequences of such intrusions are vast, and include:

  • Theft of intellectual property (for example, trade secrets or patents)
  • Compromise of sensitive information (for example, private data of employees and users)
  • Sabotage of critical organizational infrastructures (for example, deletion of databases)
  • Total control takeover of the site

Executing an APT assault requires more resources than a standard attack on web applications. The perpetrators are usually teams of experienced cybercriminals who have substantial financial backing. Some APT attacks are government-funded and used as weapons of cyber warfare.

Common attacks, such as Remote File Inclusion (RFI), SQL injection, and cross-site scripting (XSS), are frequently used by the perpetrators to establish a foothold in a targeted network. Then, Trojans and backdoor shells are often employed to expand that foothold and create a persistent presence within the perimeter.

Advanced Persistent Threat Laptop

Progression of Advanced Persistent Threats

A successful APT attack can be divided into three phases: 1) network infiltration, 2) expansion of the attacker’s presence, and 3) extraction of the accumulated data, all without being detected.

  1. Network Infiltration

As mentioned, every advanced persistent threat begins with an infiltration. Companies are typically infiltrated through the compromise of one of the following areas: web resources, network resources, or authorized human users. This is achieved either through malicious uploads or social engineering attacks. All these are threats regularly faced by large organizations.

Infiltrators may also simultaneously carry out a DDoS attack against their target. This serves both as a smokescreen to distract the network staff and as a means to weaken a security perimeter, making it easier to breach.

Once initial access is gained, attackers quickly install a backdoor malware shell that secures access to the network and allows for stealthy remote operations. Backdoors may also manifest as Trojans disguised as legitimate software.

  1. Expansion of Presence

After the foothold is established, attackers move to expand their presence within the network and thereby “create” the true advanced persistent threat.

This involves moving up the hierarchy of an organization, compromising staff members with access to the most sensitive data. By doing so, attackers are able to gather critical business information, including product line information, employee data, and financial records.

Depending on the ultimate goal of the attack, the accumulated data might be sold to a competing enterprise, altered to sabotage a company’s product line, or used to take down an entire organization. If sabotage is the motive, this phase is used to subtly gain control of more critical functions and manipulate them in a specific sequence to cause maximum damage.

For instance, attackers might delete entire databases within a company and then disrupt network communications to prolong the recovery process.

  1. Data Extraction

While an APT event is ongoing, the stolen information is typically stored in a secure location within the compromised network. Once enough data has been collected, the thieves must extract it without being detected.

Typically, white noise tactics are used to distract the security team so that the information can be moved out. This might take the form of a DDoS attack, again tying up network personnel and/or weakening the site’s defenses to facilitate extraction.

Advanced Persistent Threat hacker

Security Measures Against Advanced Persistent Threats

Proper detection and protection against APTs require a multifaceted approach from network administrators, security providers, and individual users.

Traffic Monitoring

Monitoring incoming and outgoing traffic is considered best practice to prevent the installation of backdoors and block the extraction of stolen data. Inspecting traffic within the corporate network perimeter can also help alert security personnel to any unusual behavior that may indicate malicious activity.

A web application firewall (WAF) deployed at the network edge filters traffic to web servers, thus protecting one of your most vulnerable attack surfaces. Among other functions, a WAF can help eliminate application-level attacks, such as RFI and SQL injection attacks, commonly used during the APT infiltration phase.

Traffic monitoring services for internal traffic, such as network firewalls, are the other side of this equation. They can provide a granular view that shows how users are interacting within your network, while helping to identify internal traffic anomalies (e.g., irregular logins or unusually large data transfers). The latter could indicate an ongoing APT attack. It is also possible to monitor access to file shares or system honeypots.

Lastly, incoming traffic monitoring services might be useful for detecting and removing backdoor shells. For comprehensive monitoring services, adopting the SOCaaS from SOD might be right for you.

advanced persistent threat security

Additional Measures Against Advanced Persistent Threats

In addition to the best practices already mentioned for preventing an advanced persistent threat on the corporate network, it is wise to take action on multiple fronts. In numerous other articles, we have discussed how beneficial it is for the security team to have a single place to monitor every point of the network. An excellent tool for this purpose is a SOC.

Our SOCaaS offers all the functionalities of a Security Operations Center without the burden of investing in equipment and specialized personnel. Moreover, thanks to UEBA technology, not only is our SOC able to retrieve and systematically store logs, but it is also actively involved in identifying suspicious user behavior.

These features are great for increasing the responsiveness of the security team and averting even attempts of advanced persistent threats against the corporate network.

To learn how we can help your company enhance its security, do not hesitate to contact us; we will be pleased to answer any questions.

Useful links:

Link utili:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS darkreading

RSS Full Disclosure

  • [SYSS-2024-030]: C-MOR Video Surveillance - OS Command Injection (CWE-78) September 6, 2024
    Posted by Matthias Deeg via Fulldisclosure on Sep 05Advisory ID: SYSS-2024-030 Product: C-MOR Video Surveillance Manufacturer: za-internet GmbH Affected Version(s): 5.2401, 6.00PL01 Tested Version(s): 5.2401, 6.00PL01 Vulnerability Type: OS Command Injection (CWE-78) Risk Level: High Solution Status: Open Manufacturer Notification: 2024-04-05 Solution Date: - Public Disclosure: 2024-09-04...
  • [SYSS-2024-029]: C-MOR Video Surveillance - Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component (CWE-1395) September 6, 2024
    Posted by Matthias Deeg via Fulldisclosure on Sep 05Advisory ID: SYSS-2024-029 Product: C-MOR Video Surveillance Manufacturer: za-internet GmbH Affected Version(s): 5.2401 Tested Version(s): 5.2401 Vulnerability Type: Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component (CWE-1395) Use of Unmaintained Third Party Components (CWE-1104) Risk Level: High Solution Status: Fixed...
  • [SYSS-2024-028]: C-MOR Video Surveillance - Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information (CWE-312) September 6, 2024
    Posted by Matthias Deeg via Fulldisclosure on Sep 05Advisory ID: SYSS-2024-028 Product: C-MOR Video Surveillance Manufacturer: za-internet GmbH Affected Version(s): 5.2401, 6.00PL01 Tested Version(s): 5.2401, 6.00PL01 Vulnerability Type: Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information (CWE-312) Risk Level: Medium Solution Status: Open Manufacturer Notification: 2024-04-05 Solution Date: - Public...
  • [SYSS-2024-027]: C-MOR Video Surveillance - Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269) September 6, 2024
    Posted by Matthias Deeg via Fulldisclosure on Sep 05Advisory ID: SYSS-2024-027 Product: C-MOR Video Surveillance Manufacturer: za-internet GmbH Affected Version(s): 5.2401, 6.00PL01 Tested Version(s): 5.2401, 6.00PL01 Vulnerability Type: Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269) Risk Level: High Solution Status: Open Manufacturer Notification: 2024-04-05 Solution Date: - Public Disclosure:...
  • [SYSS-2024-026]: C-MOR Video Surveillance - Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type (CWE-434) September 6, 2024
    Posted by Matthias Deeg via Fulldisclosure on Sep 05Advisory ID: SYSS-2024-026 Product: C-MOR Video Surveillance Manufacturer: za-internet GmbH Affected Version(s): 5.2401 Tested Version(s): 5.2401 Vulnerability Type: Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type (CWE-434) Risk Level: High Solution Status: Fixed Manufacturer Notification: 2024-04-05 Solution Date: 2024-07-31 Public Disclosure:...
  • [SYSS-2024-025]: C-MOR Video Surveillance - Relative Path Traversal (CWE-23) September 6, 2024
    Posted by Matthias Deeg via Fulldisclosure on Sep 05Advisory ID: SYSS-2024-025 Product: C-MOR Video Surveillance Manufacturer: za-internet GmbH Affected Version(s): 5.2401 Tested Version(s): 5.2401 Vulnerability Type: Relative Path Traversal (CWE-23) Risk Level: High Solution Status: Fixed Manufacturer Notification: 2024-04-05 Solution Date: 2024-07-31 Public Disclosure: 2024-09-04 CVE...
  • Backdoor.Win32.Symmi.qua / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) September 6, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 05Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/6e81618678ddfee69342486f6b5ee780.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Symmi.qua Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) Description: The malware listens on two random high TCP ports, when connecting (ncat) one port will return a single character like "♣" […]
  • HackTool.Win32.Freezer.br (WinSpy) / Insecure Credential Storage September 6, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 05Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/2992129c565e025ebcb0bb6f80c77812.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: HackTool.Win32.Freezer.br (WinSpy) Vulnerability: Insecure Credential Storage Description: The malware listens on TCP ports 443, 80 and provides a web interface for remote access to victim information like screenshots etc.The […]
  • Backdoor.Win32.Optix.02.b / Weak Hardcoded Credentials September 6, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 05Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/706ddc06ebbdde43e4e97de4d5af3b19.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Optix.02.b Vulnerability: Weak Hardcoded Credentials Description: Optix listens on TCP port 5151 and is packed with ASPack (2.11d). Unpacking is trivial set breakpoints on POPAD, RET, run and dump […]
  • Backdoor.Win32.JustJoke.21 (BackDoor Pro) / Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution September 6, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 05Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/4dc39c05bcc93e600dd8de16f2f7c599.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.JustJoke.21 (BackDoor Pro - v2.0b4) Vulnerability: Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution Family: JustJoke Type: PE32 MD5: 4dc39c05bcc93e600dd8de16f2f7c599 SHA256:...

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}