server cloud Piergiorgio Venuti

Server Cloud

server cloud

A cloud server or VPS (Virtual Private Server) is a fully-fledged server with its own operating system and well-defined hardware features only that unlike a classic server it shares physical resources with other virtual machines in this way more VPS can be run simultaneously on the same server (hypervisor).

This virtualization technique allows significant cost savings and an optimization of hardware resources as it is possible to run multiple operating systems on the same hardware.

 

Server Cloud – Pros cons

Pros:

 

   ♦ Migration: It is possible to “move” (migrate) a VPS from one server (hypervisor) to another (even without interruption of service).

Example: You have created a VPS on a hypervisor in Italy and you want to move it to a server in America. With a VPS, as long as the Cloud Provider has another Datacenter in America, this can be done quickly.

   ♦ Scalability: It is the possibility of increasing or decreasing the hardware resources (CPU, RAM, Disk, etc) without rebuilding the VPS and in some cases without restarting it in full transparency to users who use the services provided.
Example: A VPS of 2 cores, 1 GB of RAM and 20 GB of disk has been created but after a few months we realize that the RAM memory is insufficient for the services provided and it is necessary to increase it. With a VPS it is very easy to solve this problem, just increase the RAM from the configuration panel and the new configuration will be applied (in the case of linux systems without the need to reboot).

   ♦ Autoscaling: It is the possibility to increase or decrease the resources (scaling) automatically according to well defined hardware policies. This technique is extremely valid in cases of load peaks.
Example: A VPS has been created with 2 cores, 1 GB of RAM and 20 GB but in some periods of the year due to the high user access these resources are not sufficient, then in this case it is possible to configure these policies:

a) If the CPU is at 90% for more than 1h then the CPU of a core increases every 30min for a maximum of 6 cores and then if the CPU is less than 10% for more than 1h decrease the CPU of a core every 30 min up to a minimum of 2 cores.

b) If the RAM is 99% for more than 1h then increase the RAM of 1Gb every 30min for a maximum of 32Gb and then if the RAM is less than 50% for more than 1h decrease the RAM of a core every 30 min until at a minimum of 1Gb.

   ♦ Low cost: by comparing the cost of a VPS to that of a fiscal server like hardware resources, the cost of a VPS is much lower, especially considering that some cost items are already included in the VPS fee. :
   a) Energy consumption;  

   b) Internet band;

   c) Cost of public IP addresses;

   d) Costs related to housing (cooling, surveillance, etc); 

   e) Firewall;

   f) Technical assistance.

Cons:

   ♦ Shared resources: Depending on the configurations and characteristics of the Cloud Provider, some hardware resources, such as the CPU, could be shared so performance may be lower than a physical server. This condition is not always true as it is possible to request a 100% allocation on all hardware resources to your Cloud Provider.

Server Cloud – Limits:

  1. ♦ OS Virtualization: Not all operating systems and platforms can be virtualized (Eg AS400, Apple OS).
  2. ♦ Band: Although this is not an inherent problem of virtualization itself there could be latency differences in the Internet connection between a physical server in the company and a VPS if users are predominantly within the company and if the company has not an adequate Internet line.
    Example: A physical server in the customer’s DMZ is accessed by its LAN users via a 10Gb line, if the server is virtualized and becomes a VPS at a Cloud provider, access to it is transmitted via the client’s Internet line which may be more slow.

Server Cloud – False myths:

  1. ♦ A VPS does not have the same performance as a physical server: By allocating 100% of the physical resources and correctly dimensioning a VPS the latter has nothing to envy to a physical server from a performance point of view.
  2. ♦ A VPS is less secure than a physical server: A VPS can have the same degree of security as a physical server because it is possible to adopt the same security measures (Firewall, Antivirus, Hardening, VPN) applicable to a Fiscal server.

Check out the Cloud Server

[btnsx id=”2931″]

Useful links:

IaaS | Cloud | Infrastructure as a Service

Let’s Encrypt Free Certificates for all Webhosting users

Alternative to the NAS

CloudFlare free Plesk extension for Webhosting users

Demo Cloud Servers

Free Microsoft Windows licenses

New templates for VPS

VPS

Docs

How to have your computer network under control

VPS Metered – Cloud location

ownCloud

Home

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS darkreading

RSS Full Disclosure

  • SEC Consult SA-20241009-0 :: Local Privilege Escalation via MSI installer in Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect (CVE-2024-9473) October 10, 2024
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Oct 09>
  • APPLE-SA-10-03-2024-1 iOS 18.0.1 and iPadOS 18.0.1 October 8, 2024
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Oct 07APPLE-SA-10-03-2024-1 iOS 18.0.1 and iPadOS 18.0.1 iOS 18.0.1 and iPadOS 18.0.1 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/121373. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. Media Session Available for: iPhone […]
  • Some SIM / USIM card security (and ecosystem) info October 4, 2024
    Posted by Security Explorations on Oct 04Hello All, Those interested in SIM / USIM card security might find some information at our spin-off project page dedicated to the topic potentially useful: https://security-explorations.com/sim-usim-cards.html We share there some information based on the experiences gained in the SIM / USIM card security space, all in a hope this […]
  • SEC Consult SA-20240930-0 :: Local Privilege Escalation via MSI Installer in Nitro PDF Pro (CVE-2024-35288) October 1, 2024
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Sep 30>
  • Backdoor.Win32.Benju.a / Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution September 29, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 28Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/88922242e8805bfbc5981e55fdfadd71.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Benju.a Vulnerability: Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution Family: Benju Type: PE32 MD5: 88922242e8805bfbc5981e55fdfadd71 SHA256: 7d34804173e09d0f378dfc8c9212fe77ff51f08c9d0b73d00a19b7045ddc1f0e Vuln ID: MVID-2024-0700...
  • Backdoor.Win32.Prorat.jz / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) September 29, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 28Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/277f9a4db328476300c4da5f680902ea.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Prorat.jz Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) Description: The RAT listens on TCP ports 51100,5112,5110 and runs an FTP service. Prorat uses a vulnerable component in a secondary malware […]
  • Backdoor.Win32.Amatu.a / Remote Arbitrary File Write (RCE) September 29, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 28Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/1e2d0b90ffc23e00b743c41064bdcc6b.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Amatu.a Vulnerability: Remote Arbitrary File Write (RCE) Family: Amatu Type: PE32 MD5: 1e2d0b90ffc23e00b743c41064bdcc6b SHA256: 77fff9931013ab4de6d4be66ca4fda47be37b6f706a7062430ee8133c7521297 Vuln ID: MVID-2024-0698 Dropped...
  • Backdoor.Win32.Agent.pw / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) September 29, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 28Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/68dd7df213674e096d6ee255a7b90088.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Agent.pw Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) Description: The malware listens on TCP port 21111. Third-party attackers who can reach an infected machine can send specially crafted sequential packetz […]
  • Backdoor.Win32.Boiling / Remote Command Execution September 29, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Sep 28Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/80cb490e5d3c4205434850eff6ef5f8f.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Boiling Vulnerability: Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution Description: The malware listens on TCP port 4369. Third party adversaries who can reach an infected host, can issue single OS commands to […]
  • Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 88): a SINGLE command line shows about 20, 000 instances of CWE-73 September 29, 2024
    Posted by Stefan Kanthak on Sep 28Hi @ll, CWE-73: External Control of File Name or Path is a well-known and well-documented weakness. as well as demonstrate how to (ab)use just one instance of this weakness (introduced about 7 years ago with Microsoft Defender, so-called "security software") due to...

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}