Soluzioni Corporate di backup Alessandro Stesi

Corporate backup solutions Self-protection tests

Introduction

Corporate backup solutions: In light of the growing number of ransomware attacks in which cryptolockers stop database processes to unlock database files for encryption (Cerber, GlobeImposter, Rapid, Serpent) and they can encrypt local and network backups to request a ransom payment (Rapid, Spora), we decided to test the self-protection capabilities of the best backup solutions used in the corporate environments available for testing.

The test aims to check the sustainability of the processes and services of the products against the typical attacks on the security software described below, as well as the self-protection of the local backup and of the product files. Ransomware can encrypt configuration files and local backup files that belong to a backup program by disabling file recovery. In addition, once access to the agent or server processes is obtained, the attacker can delete backup copies of files not only locally, but also in the cloud on behalf of a backup solution.

This document is a summary of the enterprise backup solutions test report and includes a description of the test environment, a list of tested solutions and their versions, an overview of test scenarios, as well as results and conclusions based on these results. We do not classify the tested solutions and do not award any prize, but we provide the results “as is” for informational purposes only.

 

Testing environment

The tests were conducted on the virtual machines of:

 – Windows 8.1 SP1 32 bit build 9600

 – Windows 10 Enterprise 64 bit Build 16299

 – Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard 64 bit v. 6.3.9600 Build 9600

We have tested backup solutions on platforms
32 and 64 bit because the process injection techniques used in the test scenarios differ on these platforms. In addition, 32 and 64 bit product builds may contain a different set of features, including self-protection, and their implementation may depend on the architecture of the operating system.

 

Tested products

Corporate backup solutions: The most recent versions of the following products available at the time of testing were tested:

Product name

Components

Version

Management Server

Agent

12.5 9010

12.5 9010

Unified Data Protection Server

Unified Data Protection Client

6.5.4175 Aggiornamento 2 Build 667

6.5.4175.791 v.r6.5

Backup & Replication

Agent for Microsoft Windows

9.5 Aggiornamento 3

2.1.0.423

Veritas Backup Exec

Server

Agent Utility pour Windows

16.0 Rev. 1142

16.0 Rev. 1142-1632

 

Each product was installed with the default settings and updated before running the test.

 

Corporate backup solutions – Test scenarios

The test suite includes 31 tests that simulate attacks on local backup files, product files, processes, services and cloud storage that aim to block the backup and restore service. The “Product File Protection” test category contains simple tests aimed at destroying backup and application files making it impossible to recover data encrypted by ransomware.

The second group of tests “Protection of processes and products services” is essential for self-protection since the malware can inject the malicious code into a backup agent and act on behalf of a backup solution obtaining all the necessary privileges to check the backup files. At the behest of an attacker, a malicious process can interrupt processes and services with consequent blocking of the backup and restore application

or deleting backup files on behalf of a backup solution. The latest series of tests is “Cloud backup and recovery protection” and is addressed to communication interfaces with cloud storage. The attack of DNS poisoning or the improper use of the CLI can cause the cloud backup service to be interrupted.

 

Corporate backup solutions – Conclusions

The purpose of the test was to verify the backup software’s self-protection capabilities to protect related files, processes, services and cloud storage from scenarios that can potentially be run by ransomware.

The results showed that most of the tested products are not ready in many cases to counter ransomware-type attacks by allowing a potential attacker to block user backups and disable backup and restore services. Only Acronis Backup has shown good results with an 87% and 81% effectiveness rate for 32-bit and 64-bit products, similarly providing complete self-protection and service sustainability features.

Download the complete department here: Nio Guard Independent Study_IT

 

[btnsx id=”2931″]

Related articles:

Modern Data Protection: The Difference is in the Cloud

BaaS | Acronis Cloud Backup

BaaS | Cloud Backup | Backup as a Service

[Name change] Acronis Data Cloud –> Acronis Cyber Cloud

Stay in control of your fast-moving, quick-shifting data

A Hybrid Cloud Backup Solution for System Integrator and reseller

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • MitM attack against OpenSSH's VerifyHostKeyDNS-enabled client February 21, 2025
    Posted by Qualys Security Advisory via Fulldisclosure on Feb 20Qualys Security Advisory CVE-2025-26465: MitM attack against OpenSSH's VerifyHostKeyDNS-enabled client CVE-2025-26466: DoS attack against OpenSSH's client and server ======================================================================== Contents ======================================================================== Summary Background Experiments Results MitM attack against OpenSSH's VerifyHostKeyDNS-enabled client DoS...
  • Self Stored XSS - acp2sev7.2.2 February 21, 2025
    Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Feb 20# Exploit Title: Self Stored XSS - acp2sev7.2.2 # Date: 02/2025 # Exploit Author: Andrey Stoykov # Version: 7.2.2 # Tested on: Ubuntu 22.04 # Blog: https://msecureltd.blogspot.com/2025/02/friday-fun-pentest-series-19-self.html Self Stored XSS #1: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Visit "http://192.168.58.168/acp2se/mul/muladmin.php" and login with "admin" / "adminpass" 2. In the field "Put the […]
  • Python's official documentation contains textbook example of insecure code (XSS) February 21, 2025
    Posted by Georgi Guninski on Feb 20Python's official documentation contains textbook example of insecure code (XSS) Date: 2025-02-18 Author: Georgi Guninski === form = cgi.FieldStorage() if "name" not in form or "addr" not in form: print("Error") print("Please fill in the name and addr fields.") return print("name:", form["name"].value) print("addr:",...
  • Re: Netgear Router Administrative Web Interface Lacks Transport Encryption By Default February 18, 2025
    Posted by Gynvael Coldwind on Feb 17Hi, This isn't really a problem a vendor can solve in firmware (apart from offering configuration via cloud, which has its own issues). Even if they would enable TLS/SSL by default, it would just give one a false sense of security, since: - the certificates would be invalid (public […]
  • Monero 18.3.4 zero-day DoS vulnerability has been dropped publicly on social network. February 16, 2025
    Posted by upper.underflow via Fulldisclosure on Feb 16Hello, About an hour ago, a group appearing to be named WyRCV2 posted a note on the nostr social network, which can be found at the following link: https://primal.net/e/note1vzh0mj9rcxax9cgcdapupyxeehjprd68gd9kk9wrv939m8knulrs4780x7 Save, share, use. The paste link includes a list of nodes that the attacker has instructed to target, along […]
  • Netgear Router Administrative Web Interface Lacks Transport Encryption By Default February 16, 2025
    Posted by Ryan Delaney via Fulldisclosure on Feb 16
  • [CVE-2024-54756] GZDoom <= 4.13.1 Arbitrary Code Execution via Malicious ZScript February 16, 2025
    Posted by Gabriel Valachi via Fulldisclosure on Feb 15In GZDoom 4.13.1 and below, there is a vulnerability involving array sizes in ZScript, the game engine&apos;s primary scripting language. It is possible to dynamically allocate an array of 1073741823 dwords, permitting access to the rest of the heap from the start of the array and causing […]
  • Re: Text injection on https://www.google.com/sorry/index via ?q parameter (no XSS) February 16, 2025
    Posted by David Fifield on Feb 15Today at about 2025-02-13 19:00 I noticed the "≠" is back, but now the type 0x12 payload of the ?q query parameter gets formatted into the string representation of an IP address, rather than being copied almost verbatim into the page. If the payload length is 4 bytes, it […]
  • SEC Consult SA-20250211-0 :: Multiple vulnerabilities in Wattsense Bridge February 13, 2025
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Feb 12SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20250211-0 > ======================================================================= title: Multiple vulnerabilities product: Wattsense - Wattsense Bridge vulnerable version: Wattsense Bridge * Hardware Revision: WSG-EU-SC-14-00, 20230801 * Firmware Revision: Wattsense (Wattsense minimal)...
  • APPLE-SA-02-10-2025-2 iPadOS 17.7.5 February 11, 2025
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Feb 10APPLE-SA-02-10-2025-2 iPadOS 17.7.5 iPadOS 17.7.5 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/122173. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. Accessibility Available for: iPad Pro 12.9-inch 2nd generation, iPad Pro 10.5-inch, […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}