Alessandro Stesi
Corporate backup solutions Self-protection tests
Introduction
Corporate backup solutions: In light of the growing number of ransomware attacks in which cryptolockers stop database processes to unlock database files for encryption (Cerber, GlobeImposter, Rapid, Serpent) and they can encrypt local and network backups to request a ransom payment (Rapid, Spora), we decided to test the self-protection capabilities of the best backup solutions used in the corporate environments available for testing.
The test aims to check the sustainability of the processes and services of the products against the typical attacks on the security software described below, as well as the self-protection of the local backup and of the product files. Ransomware can encrypt configuration files and local backup files that belong to a backup program by disabling file recovery. In addition, once access to the agent or server processes is obtained, the attacker can delete backup copies of files not only locally, but also in the cloud on behalf of a backup solution.
This document is a summary of the enterprise backup solutions test report and includes a description of the test environment, a list of tested solutions and their versions, an overview of test scenarios, as well as results and conclusions based on these results. We do not classify the tested solutions and do not award any prize, but we provide the results “as is” for informational purposes only.
Testing environment
The tests were conducted on the virtual machines of:
– Windows 8.1 SP1 32 bit build 9600
– Windows 10 Enterprise 64 bit Build 16299
– Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard 64 bit v. 6.3.9600 Build 9600
We have tested backup solutions on platforms
32 and 64 bit because the process injection techniques used in the test scenarios differ on these platforms. In addition, 32 and 64 bit product builds may contain a different set of features, including self-protection, and their implementation may depend on the architecture of the operating system.
Tested products
Corporate backup solutions: The most recent versions of the following products available at the time of testing were tested:
|
Product name |
Components |
Version |
|
Management Server Agent |
12.5 9010 12.5 9010 |
|
|
Unified Data Protection Server Unified Data Protection Client |
6.5.4175 Aggiornamento 2 Build 667 6.5.4175.791 v.r6.5 |
|
|
Backup & Replication Agent for Microsoft Windows |
9.5 Aggiornamento 3 2.1.0.423 |
|
|
Veritas Backup Exec |
Server Agent Utility pour Windows |
16.0 Rev. 1142 16.0 Rev. 1142-1632
|
Each product was installed with the default settings and updated before running the test.
Corporate backup solutions – Test scenarios
The test suite includes 31 tests that simulate attacks on local backup files, product files, processes, services and cloud storage that aim to block the backup and restore service. The “Product File Protection” test category contains simple tests aimed at destroying backup and application files making it impossible to recover data encrypted by ransomware.
The second group of tests “Protection of processes and products services” is essential for self-protection since the malware can inject the malicious code into a backup agent and act on behalf of a backup solution obtaining all the necessary privileges to check the backup files. At the behest of an attacker, a malicious process can interrupt processes and services with consequent blocking of the backup and restore application
or deleting backup files on behalf of a backup solution. The latest series of tests is “Cloud backup and recovery protection” and is addressed to communication interfaces with cloud storage. The attack of DNS poisoning or the improper use of the CLI can cause the cloud backup service to be interrupted.
Corporate backup solutions – Conclusions
The purpose of the test was to verify the backup software’s self-protection capabilities to protect related files, processes, services and cloud storage from scenarios that can potentially be run by ransomware.
The results showed that most of the tested products are not ready in many cases to counter ransomware-type attacks by allowing a potential attacker to block user backups and disable backup and restore services. Only Acronis Backup has shown good results with an 87% and 81% effectiveness rate for 32-bit and 64-bit products, similarly providing complete self-protection and service sustainability features.
Download the complete department here: Nio Guard Independent Study_IT
[btnsx id=”2931″]
Related articles:
Modern Data Protection: The Difference is in the Cloud
BaaS | Cloud Backup | Backup as a Service
[Name change] Acronis Data Cloud –> Acronis Cyber Cloud
Stay in control of your fast-moving, quick-shifting data
A Hybrid Cloud Backup Solution for System Integrator and reseller
Share
RSS
More Articles…
- From Secure Online Desktop to Cyberfero: rebranding of the leading cybersecurity company
- NIS: what it is and how it protects cybersecurity
- Advanced persistent threats (APTs): what they are and how to defend yourself
- Penetration Testing and MFA: A Dual Strategy to Maximize Security
- Penetration Testing: Where to Strike to Protect Your IT Network
- Ransomware: a plague that brings companies and institutions to their knees. Should you pay the ransom? Here is the answer.
- Why IT audit and log management are important for Cybersecurity
- Red Team, Blue Team and Purple Team: what are the differences?
Categories …
- Backup as a Service (18)
- Acronis Cloud Backup (11)
- Veeam Cloud Connect (4)
- Cloud Conference (3)
- Cloud CRM (1)
- Cloud Server/VPS (22)
- Conferenza Cloud (4)
- Cyberfero (15)
- ICT Monitoring (5)
- Log Management (2)
- News (25)
- ownCloud (4)
- Privacy (7)
- Security (203)
- Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) (8)
- Deception (4)
- Ethical Phishing (11)
- Netwrix Auditor (2)
- Penetration Test (11)
- Posture Guard (3)
- SOCaaS (65)
- Vulnerabilities (84)
- Web Hosting (15)
Tags
darkreading
- Feds Warn on Russian Actors Targeting Critical Infrastructure September 6, 2024In the past, Putin's Unit 29155 has utilized malware like WhisperGate to target organizations, particularly those in Ukraine.
- CISA Flags ICS Bugs in Baxter, Mitsubishi Products September 6, 2024The vulnerabilities affect industrial control tech used across the healthcare and critical manufacturing sectors.
- Commercial Spyware Use Roars Back Despite Sanctions September 6, 2024Vendors of mercenary spyware tools used by nation-states to track citizens and enemies have gotten savvy about evading efforts to limit their use.
- Cybersecurity Talent Shortage Prompts White House Action September 6, 2024The Biden administration launches an initiative to encourage careers in cybersecurity, as businesses try new tactics to get unfilled IT security roles staffed.
- FreeBSD Gets €686,400 to Boost Security Features September 6, 2024The funds from Germany’s Sovereign Tech Fund will be used to integrate security features such as zero trust capabilities and tools for software bill of materials.
- Using Transparency & Sharing to Defend Critical Infrastructure September 6, 2024No organization can single-handedly defend against sophisticated attacks. Governments and private sector entities need to collaborate, share information, and develop defenses against cyber threats
- What Is the Shared Fate Model? September 5, 2024New threats, an overburdened workforce, and regulatory pressures mean cloud service providers need a more resilient model than the shared responsibility framework. That's where "shared fate" comes in.
- HackerOne Appoints Kara Sprague As CEO September 5, 2024
- Kiteworks Bolsters Its Secure Data Collection Capabilities With 123FormBuilder Acquisition September 5, 2024
- Palo Alto Networks® Closes Acquisition of IBM's QRadar SaaS Assets September 5, 2024
Full Disclosure
- [SYSS-2024-030]: C-MOR Video Surveillance - OS Command Injection (CWE-78) September 6, 2024Posted by Matthias Deeg via Fulldisclosure on Sep 05Advisory ID: SYSS-2024-030 Product: C-MOR Video Surveillance Manufacturer: za-internet GmbH Affected Version(s): 5.2401, 6.00PL01 Tested Version(s): 5.2401, 6.00PL01 Vulnerability Type: OS Command Injection (CWE-78) Risk Level: High Solution Status: Open Manufacturer Notification: 2024-04-05 Solution Date: - Public Disclosure: 2024-09-04...
- [SYSS-2024-029]: C-MOR Video Surveillance - Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component (CWE-1395) September 6, 2024Posted by Matthias Deeg via Fulldisclosure on Sep 05Advisory ID: SYSS-2024-029 Product: C-MOR Video Surveillance Manufacturer: za-internet GmbH Affected Version(s): 5.2401 Tested Version(s): 5.2401 Vulnerability Type: Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component (CWE-1395) Use of Unmaintained Third Party Components (CWE-1104) Risk Level: High Solution Status: Fixed...
- [SYSS-2024-028]: C-MOR Video Surveillance - Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information (CWE-312) September 6, 2024Posted by Matthias Deeg via Fulldisclosure on Sep 05Advisory ID: SYSS-2024-028 Product: C-MOR Video Surveillance Manufacturer: za-internet GmbH Affected Version(s): 5.2401, 6.00PL01 Tested Version(s): 5.2401, 6.00PL01 Vulnerability Type: Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information (CWE-312) Risk Level: Medium Solution Status: Open Manufacturer Notification: 2024-04-05 Solution Date: - Public...
- [SYSS-2024-027]: C-MOR Video Surveillance - Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269) September 6, 2024Posted by Matthias Deeg via Fulldisclosure on Sep 05Advisory ID: SYSS-2024-027 Product: C-MOR Video Surveillance Manufacturer: za-internet GmbH Affected Version(s): 5.2401, 6.00PL01 Tested Version(s): 5.2401, 6.00PL01 Vulnerability Type: Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269) Risk Level: High Solution Status: Open Manufacturer Notification: 2024-04-05 Solution Date: - Public Disclosure:...
- [SYSS-2024-026]: C-MOR Video Surveillance - Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type (CWE-434) September 6, 2024Posted by Matthias Deeg via Fulldisclosure on Sep 05Advisory ID: SYSS-2024-026 Product: C-MOR Video Surveillance Manufacturer: za-internet GmbH Affected Version(s): 5.2401 Tested Version(s): 5.2401 Vulnerability Type: Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type (CWE-434) Risk Level: High Solution Status: Fixed Manufacturer Notification: 2024-04-05 Solution Date: 2024-07-31 Public Disclosure:...
- [SYSS-2024-025]: C-MOR Video Surveillance - Relative Path Traversal (CWE-23) September 6, 2024Posted by Matthias Deeg via Fulldisclosure on Sep 05Advisory ID: SYSS-2024-025 Product: C-MOR Video Surveillance Manufacturer: za-internet GmbH Affected Version(s): 5.2401 Tested Version(s): 5.2401 Vulnerability Type: Relative Path Traversal (CWE-23) Risk Level: High Solution Status: Fixed Manufacturer Notification: 2024-04-05 Solution Date: 2024-07-31 Public Disclosure: 2024-09-04 CVE...
- Backdoor.Win32.Symmi.qua / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) September 6, 2024Posted by malvuln on Sep 05Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/6e81618678ddfee69342486f6b5ee780.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Symmi.qua Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) Description: The malware listens on two random high TCP ports, when connecting (ncat) one port will return a single character like "♣" […]
- HackTool.Win32.Freezer.br (WinSpy) / Insecure Credential Storage September 6, 2024Posted by malvuln on Sep 05Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/2992129c565e025ebcb0bb6f80c77812.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: HackTool.Win32.Freezer.br (WinSpy) Vulnerability: Insecure Credential Storage Description: The malware listens on TCP ports 443, 80 and provides a web interface for remote access to victim information like screenshots etc.The […]
- Backdoor.Win32.Optix.02.b / Weak Hardcoded Credentials September 6, 2024Posted by malvuln on Sep 05Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/706ddc06ebbdde43e4e97de4d5af3b19.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Optix.02.b Vulnerability: Weak Hardcoded Credentials Description: Optix listens on TCP port 5151 and is packed with ASPack (2.11d). Unpacking is trivial set breakpoints on POPAD, RET, run and dump […]
- Backdoor.Win32.JustJoke.21 (BackDoor Pro) / Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution September 6, 2024Posted by malvuln on Sep 05Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/4dc39c05bcc93e600dd8de16f2f7c599.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.JustJoke.21 (BackDoor Pro - v2.0b4) Vulnerability: Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution Family: JustJoke Type: PE32 MD5: 4dc39c05bcc93e600dd8de16f2f7c599 SHA256:...
Customers
Twitter FEED
Recent activity
-
SecureOnlineDesktop
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes L'impatto crescente delle minacce informatiche, su sistemi operativi privati op… https://t.co/FimxTS4o9G
-
SecureOnlineDesktop
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes The growing impact of cyber threats, on private or corporate operating systems… https://t.co/y6G6RYA9n1
-
SecureOnlineDesktop
Tempo di lettura stimato: 6 minuti Today we are talking about the CTI update of our services. Data security is… https://t.co/YAZkn7iFqa
-
SecureOnlineDesktop
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes Il tema della sicurezza delle informazioni è di grande attualità in questo peri… https://t.co/tfve5Kzr09
-
SecureOnlineDesktop
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes The issue of information security is very topical in this historical period ch… https://t.co/TP8gvdRcrF
Newsletter
{subscription_form_1}Products and Solutions
Partners
Cloud Models
News
- From Secure Online Desktop to Cyberfero: rebranding of the leading cybersecurity company May 6, 2024
- NIS: what it is and how it protects cybersecurity April 22, 2024
- Advanced persistent threats (APTs): what they are and how to defend yourself April 17, 2024
- Penetration Testing and MFA: A Dual Strategy to Maximize Security April 15, 2024
- Penetration Testing: Where to Strike to Protect Your IT Network March 25, 2024
Google Reviews
Ottima azienda, servizi molto utili, staff qualificato e competente. Raccomandata!read more
Ottimo supportoread more
E' un piacere poter collaborare con realtà di questo tiporead more
Un ottimo fornitore.
Io personalmente ho parlato con l' Ing. Venuti, valore aggiunto indubbiamente.read more
About
© 2024 Cyberfero s.r.l. All Rights Reserved. Sede Legale: via Statuto 3 - 42121 Reggio Emilia (RE) – PEC [email protected] Cod. fiscale e P.IVA 03058120357 – R.E.A. 356650 Informativa Privacy - Certificazioni ISO