Mitre Att&ck cover Giacomo Lanzi

Mitre Att&ck ™: an overview

Mitre Att&ck is a global knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques based on real observations of cyber attacks. These are displayed in arrays organized by attack tactics, from initial system access and data theft to machine control. There are arrays for common desktop platforms (Linux, macOS and Windows) and for mobile ones.

What is MITRE ATT&CK ™ and what does it mean?

ATT&CK stands for “adversarial tactics, techniques, and common knowledge” and that is: tactics, adversary techniques and common knowledge. Let’s try to go deeper.

Tactics and techniques are a modern way of thinking about cyber attacks. Rather than looking at the results of an attack – an indicator of compromise (IoC) – security analysts should look at the tactics and techniques that indicate an attack is in progress. Tactics represent the goal you want to achieve, while techniques represent how an opponent plans to achieve it.

Common knowledge is the documented use of tactics and techniques used by opponents. Essentially, common knowledge is the documentation of the procedures used by the attacker. Those familiar with cybersecurity may be familiar with the term “tactics, techniques and procedures” or TTP. This same concept has been used by ATT&CK ™, replacing the term procedure with common knowledge.

Who is MITRE and what is the goal of ATT&CK ™?

MITRE is a US government funded research organization based in Bedford, MA, and McLean, VA. The company was spun off from MIT in 1958 and was involved in a number of top secret commercial projects for various agencies. These included the development of the FAA’s air traffic control system and the AWACS radar system. MITRE has a substantial cybersecurity practice funded by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

A curiosity: the word Mitre means nothing. Apparently one of the first members, James McCormack, wanted a name that meant nothing but was evocative. Some mistakenly think it means Massachusetts Institute of Technology Research and Engineering.

ATT&CK’s goal is to create a comprehensive list of known opponent tactics and techniques used during a cyber attack. Open to governmental, educational and commercial organizations, it should be able to gather a wide, and hopefully comprehensive, range of attack phases and sequences. MITRE ATT&CK aims to create a standard taxonomy to make communications between organizations more specific.

How is the ATT&CK ™ matrix used?

The matrix visually organizes all known tactics and techniques in an easy to understand format. Attack tactics are shown above, and individual techniques are listed below in each column. An attack sequence would involve at least one technique per tactic, and a complete attack sequence would be constructed by moving from left (Initial Access) to right (Command and Control). It is possible to use more techniques for a single tactic. For example, an attacker might try both a Spearphishing Attachment and a Spearphishing Link as initial login tactics.

Here is an example of a matrix:

Mitre Atta&ck matrix

In this matrix there are all the phases of an attack sequence. It is organized so that the tactics are ordered from right to left according to the attack sequence. Under each tactic the corresponding techniques, some of which contain sub-techniques. The two techniques mentioned above are actually sub-techniques of phishing which are part of the first step in the sequence (first column on the left).

Example

It is not necessary for an attacker to use all eleven tactics at the top of the matrix. Rather, the attacker will use the minimum number of tactics to achieve his goal, as it is more efficient and provides less chance of discovery. In this attack (illustrated in the diagram below), the adversary performs initial access to the CEO’s administrative assistant credentials using a Spearphishing link delivered in an email. Once in possession of the administrator’s credentials, the attacker searches for a Remote System Discovery of the Discovery phase.

Stages of an attack

Example: the tactics and techniques used in the phases of an attack

Let’s say they’re looking for sensitive data in a Dropbox folder that the admin also has access to, so there’s no need to increase privileges. The collection, which is the last stage, is done by downloading the files from Dropbox to the attacker’s machine.

Note that if you are using behavior analysis, a security analyst could detect the attack in progress by identifying abnormal user behavior.

And that’s exactly what a SOC should do, here, roughly, how the attack could be mitigated: suppose the administrator clicked a link that no one in the company has ever clicked before, then the administrator logged in a particular Dropbox folder at an unusual time. During the final phase of the attack, the attacker’s computer entered the Dropbox folder for the first time. With behavioral analysis, these activities would be flagged as suspicious user behavior.

To consult ATT&CK

To consult this resource just visit his site and you will find yourself in front of the matrix of which I published a screenshot a little while ago. Suppose we want to consult the Spearphishing Link technique. By clicking on it, the corresponding page will open containing in-depth information about it, such as a description of the technique, what sub-techniques exist, examples of procedures that include it and suggestions for risk mitigation.

Basically all the information necessary to know and defend oneself appropriately from each technique is available.

Tecnica Spearphishing Link Card Mitre Att&ck

The initial part of the Spearphishing Link data sheet.

Conclusions

The advantages of a resource like MITRE ATT&CK are truly remarkable. Cyber security teams have a valuable ally at their disposal, to which they can add dedicated tools for its consultation.

While it is almost certain that attackers are adapting as defenders deploy new skills, it is also true that ATT&CK provides a way to describe the new techniques they develop.

[btnsx id=”2931″]

Useful links:

SOCaaS

Security: Pentest and verification of vulnerabilities

What is a Network Lateral Movement and how to defend yourself

Is SOCaaS useful for your business?

Computer network security: PT vs. VA

 

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • SEC Consult SA-20250226-0 :: Multiple vulnerabilities in Siemens A8000 CP-8050 & CP-8031 PLC February 27, 2025
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Feb 27SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20250226-0 > ======================================================================= title: Multiple Vulnerabilities product: Siemens A8000 CP-8050 PLC Siemens A8000 CP-8031 PLC vulnerable version:
  • Re: MitM attack against OpenSSH's VerifyHostKeyDNS-enabled client February 27, 2025
    Posted by Jordy Zomer on Feb 27Hey all, First of all, cool findings! I&apos;ve been working on the CodeQL query and have a revised version that I think improves accuracy and might offer some performance gains (though I haven&apos;t done rigorous benchmarking). The key change is the use of `StackVariableReachability` and making sure that there&apos;s […]
  • MitM attack against OpenSSH's VerifyHostKeyDNS-enabled client February 21, 2025
    Posted by Qualys Security Advisory via Fulldisclosure on Feb 20Qualys Security Advisory CVE-2025-26465: MitM attack against OpenSSH&apos;s VerifyHostKeyDNS-enabled client CVE-2025-26466: DoS attack against OpenSSH&apos;s client and server ======================================================================== Contents ======================================================================== Summary Background Experiments Results MitM attack against OpenSSH&apos;s VerifyHostKeyDNS-enabled client DoS...
  • Self Stored XSS - acp2sev7.2.2 February 21, 2025
    Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Feb 20# Exploit Title: Self Stored XSS - acp2sev7.2.2 # Date: 02/2025 # Exploit Author: Andrey Stoykov # Version: 7.2.2 # Tested on: Ubuntu 22.04 # Blog: https://msecureltd.blogspot.com/2025/02/friday-fun-pentest-series-19-self.html Self Stored XSS #1: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Visit "http://192.168.58.168/acp2se/mul/muladmin.php" and login with "admin" / "adminpass" 2. In the field "Put the […]
  • Python's official documentation contains textbook example of insecure code (XSS) February 21, 2025
    Posted by Georgi Guninski on Feb 20Python&apos;s official documentation contains textbook example of insecure code (XSS) Date: 2025-02-18 Author: Georgi Guninski === form = cgi.FieldStorage() if "name" not in form or "addr" not in form: print("Error") print("Please fill in the name and addr fields.") return print("name:", form["name"].value) print("addr:",...
  • Re: Netgear Router Administrative Web Interface Lacks Transport Encryption By Default February 18, 2025
    Posted by Gynvael Coldwind on Feb 17Hi, This isn&apos;t really a problem a vendor can solve in firmware (apart from offering configuration via cloud, which has its own issues). Even if they would enable TLS/SSL by default, it would just give one a false sense of security, since: - the certificates would be invalid (public […]
  • Monero 18.3.4 zero-day DoS vulnerability has been dropped publicly on social network. February 16, 2025
    Posted by upper.underflow via Fulldisclosure on Feb 16Hello, About an hour ago, a group appearing to be named WyRCV2 posted a note on the nostr social network, which can be found at the following link: https://primal.net/e/note1vzh0mj9rcxax9cgcdapupyxeehjprd68gd9kk9wrv939m8knulrs4780x7 Save, share, use. The paste link includes a list of nodes that the attacker has instructed to target, along […]
  • Netgear Router Administrative Web Interface Lacks Transport Encryption By Default February 16, 2025
    Posted by Ryan Delaney via Fulldisclosure on Feb 16
  • [CVE-2024-54756] GZDoom <= 4.13.1 Arbitrary Code Execution via Malicious ZScript February 16, 2025
    Posted by Gabriel Valachi via Fulldisclosure on Feb 15In GZDoom 4.13.1 and below, there is a vulnerability involving array sizes in ZScript, the game engine&apos;s primary scripting language. It is possible to dynamically allocate an array of 1073741823 dwords, permitting access to the rest of the heap from the start of the array and causing […]
  • Re: Text injection on https://www.google.com/sorry/index via ?q parameter (no XSS) February 16, 2025
    Posted by David Fifield on Feb 15Today at about 2025-02-13 19:00 I noticed the "≠" is back, but now the type 0x12 payload of the ?q query parameter gets formatted into the string representation of an IP address, rather than being copied almost verbatim into the page. If the payload length is 4 bytes, it […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}