pentest e sicurezza informatica Giacomo Lanzi

Security: pentest and verification of vulnerabilities

The computer security of a system is very important to avoid unpleasant inconveniences due to malicious attacks. In principle, it is not enough to set up a complete security system, you must also check that the above systems are working. To do this we turn to professionals who can carry out pentest (penetration tests) and carry out a vulnerability check.

To verify the security of a system, two specific procedures are used. The first, the verification of vulnerabilities, deals with researching and listing the possible breaches in the infrastructure. The second, the Penetration Test (PenTest), seeks to exploit the weaknesses identified to gain access to a closed system.

In essence it is a question of doing what an attacker would do: use his tools by checking their effectiveness or not on the security system. If these operations are carried out in a controlled environment, it will be possible to take measures before a real harmful intrusion occurs.

Vulnerability verification

Known as vulnerability assessment or VA, it is the process of identifying threats and vulnerabilities on a specific machine or network.

The process tends to take place in the following phases:

Analysis of the characteristics
      Using automatic software to speed up the process, one identifies the general characteristics of a target.
Identification of weak points
      We identify which are the weak points that could be exploited to hit the target.
Specific manual tests
      Sometimes a series of manual tests are carried out with specific tools. This is to further assess the security of specific applications or networks and to verify previously detected vulnerabilities.
Writing a report
      After identifying the weak points of a goal, a document is drawn up stating the results.
A vulnerability check is important if understood as a proactive check carried out cyclically. Discovering vulnerabilities in order to be able to repair the identified problems is essential in the context of a security management program.

A serious security management program also includes penetration tests. However, the latter will be required less frequently than the VA. Vulnerability verification should be performed frequently. Only in this way can you be sure to immediately identify the weak points of a system and reduce the chances of a successful attack.

Pentest

A penetration test, or PenTest, consists of a series of manual processes. In general, the ultimate goal of an ethical hacker carrying out such a test is to gain unauthorized access to a target. To do this, vulnerabilities discovered in the verification phase are also used.

A pentest is often required in various scenarios which may include:

   – the launch of a new application
   – a major change or update of the network
   – adaptation to new compliance regulations
   – a violation due to a targeted attack
Since there are various reasons for conducting a pentest, the goals you set yourself can often differ widely.

Who usually performs a pentest / VA?

The technicians who deal with it are hackers, obviously the so-called white-hats, those who exploit their knowledge for good. A pentester team may however have an extremely diverse background in education and experience.

What I really care ‘that all have one thing in common: a passion for safety and great curiosity’ to find and test the weaknesses of a system.

pentest

Could the work be automated?

The short answer is: yes and no. There are some phases that take place automatically and others that require the intervention of a technician.

The main stage of a vulnerability assessment is carried out by an automated application that will perform checks on a network, application or code. The whole execution of this phase is automatic. However, setting up this step and subsequent reporting are all manual actions.

In addition, a pentest requires much more manual labor and cannot be automated. It can happen, in fact, that during a pentest there are new breaches that had not been identified before.

Most of a pentest is the result of manual labor by testers. The software used can only provide data which will then be analyzed in depth by the technicians.

The manual test of a large application can take a lot of time, resources and a lot of previous knowledge on the architecture of the web-apps and on the test frameworks used.

Cyber security

The issue of security usually comes to the surface only when it is too late and an attack has already been carried out. If there is a need to manage sensitive data, complex networks or simply want to be sure not to suffer damage, planning infrastructure verification actions is vital.

If you are interested in the security of your web app or corporate network, contact us.

[btnsx id=”2931″]

Useful links:

Vulnerability Assessment & Penetration Test

 

 

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • SEC Consult SA-20250226-0 :: Multiple vulnerabilities in Siemens A8000 CP-8050 & CP-8031 PLC February 27, 2025
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Feb 27SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20250226-0 > ======================================================================= title: Multiple Vulnerabilities product: Siemens A8000 CP-8050 PLC Siemens A8000 CP-8031 PLC vulnerable version:
  • Re: MitM attack against OpenSSH's VerifyHostKeyDNS-enabled client February 27, 2025
    Posted by Jordy Zomer on Feb 27Hey all, First of all, cool findings! I&apos;ve been working on the CodeQL query and have a revised version that I think improves accuracy and might offer some performance gains (though I haven&apos;t done rigorous benchmarking). The key change is the use of `StackVariableReachability` and making sure that there&apos;s […]
  • MitM attack against OpenSSH's VerifyHostKeyDNS-enabled client February 21, 2025
    Posted by Qualys Security Advisory via Fulldisclosure on Feb 20Qualys Security Advisory CVE-2025-26465: MitM attack against OpenSSH&apos;s VerifyHostKeyDNS-enabled client CVE-2025-26466: DoS attack against OpenSSH&apos;s client and server ======================================================================== Contents ======================================================================== Summary Background Experiments Results MitM attack against OpenSSH&apos;s VerifyHostKeyDNS-enabled client DoS...
  • Self Stored XSS - acp2sev7.2.2 February 21, 2025
    Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Feb 20# Exploit Title: Self Stored XSS - acp2sev7.2.2 # Date: 02/2025 # Exploit Author: Andrey Stoykov # Version: 7.2.2 # Tested on: Ubuntu 22.04 # Blog: https://msecureltd.blogspot.com/2025/02/friday-fun-pentest-series-19-self.html Self Stored XSS #1: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Visit "http://192.168.58.168/acp2se/mul/muladmin.php" and login with "admin" / "adminpass" 2. In the field "Put the […]
  • Python's official documentation contains textbook example of insecure code (XSS) February 21, 2025
    Posted by Georgi Guninski on Feb 20Python&apos;s official documentation contains textbook example of insecure code (XSS) Date: 2025-02-18 Author: Georgi Guninski === form = cgi.FieldStorage() if "name" not in form or "addr" not in form: print("Error") print("Please fill in the name and addr fields.") return print("name:", form["name"].value) print("addr:",...
  • Re: Netgear Router Administrative Web Interface Lacks Transport Encryption By Default February 18, 2025
    Posted by Gynvael Coldwind on Feb 17Hi, This isn&apos;t really a problem a vendor can solve in firmware (apart from offering configuration via cloud, which has its own issues). Even if they would enable TLS/SSL by default, it would just give one a false sense of security, since: - the certificates would be invalid (public […]
  • Monero 18.3.4 zero-day DoS vulnerability has been dropped publicly on social network. February 16, 2025
    Posted by upper.underflow via Fulldisclosure on Feb 16Hello, About an hour ago, a group appearing to be named WyRCV2 posted a note on the nostr social network, which can be found at the following link: https://primal.net/e/note1vzh0mj9rcxax9cgcdapupyxeehjprd68gd9kk9wrv939m8knulrs4780x7 Save, share, use. The paste link includes a list of nodes that the attacker has instructed to target, along […]
  • Netgear Router Administrative Web Interface Lacks Transport Encryption By Default February 16, 2025
    Posted by Ryan Delaney via Fulldisclosure on Feb 16
  • [CVE-2024-54756] GZDoom <= 4.13.1 Arbitrary Code Execution via Malicious ZScript February 16, 2025
    Posted by Gabriel Valachi via Fulldisclosure on Feb 15In GZDoom 4.13.1 and below, there is a vulnerability involving array sizes in ZScript, the game engine&apos;s primary scripting language. It is possible to dynamically allocate an array of 1073741823 dwords, permitting access to the rest of the heap from the start of the array and causing […]
  • Re: Text injection on https://www.google.com/sorry/index via ?q parameter (no XSS) February 16, 2025
    Posted by David Fifield on Feb 15Today at about 2025-02-13 19:00 I noticed the "≠" is back, but now the type 0x12 payload of the ?q query parameter gets formatted into the string representation of an IP address, rather than being copied almost verbatim into the page. If the payload length is 4 bytes, it […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}