shadow IT Giacomo Lanzi

Shadow IT: an overview

The practice of shadow IT is the use of computer systems, devices, software, applications and services without the explicit approval of the IT department. In recent years, it has grown exponentially with the adoption of cloud-based applications and services.

While shadow IT could improve employee productivity and drive innovation, it can also introduce serious security risks to the organization due to data breaches, potential compliance breaches and more.

Why users practice shadow IT

One of the main reasons employees apply shadow IT is simply to work more efficiently. A 2012 RSA study reported that 35% of employees believe they need to bypass their company’s security policies just to get their job done right. For example, an employee may discover a better file sharing application than is officially allowed. Once you start using it, the use may spread to other members of your department.

The rapid growth of cloud-based consumer applications has also increased the adoption of shadow IT practices. The days of packaged software are long gone; Common applications such as Slack and Dropbox are available with a simple click, and corporate data is easily copied beyond work applications to employee personal devices, such as smartphones or laptops, especially in BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) working conditions .

Shadow IT: Security Risks and Challenges

The point is that if the IT department is not aware of the use of an application, they cannot support or guarantee that it is secure. Industry analyst firm Gartner predicted, in 2018, that by 2020, one-third of successful attacks businesses experience focus on their shadow IT assets.

While it is clear that the practice will not go away, organizations can minimize risks by educating end users and taking preventative measures to monitor and manage unauthorized applications.

Not all shadow IT is inherently dangerous, but some features like file sharing and storage and collaboration (for example, Google Docs) can cause sensitive data leaks. This risk goes beyond applications alone: the RSA study also reports that 63% of employees send work documents to their personal email to work from home, exposing data to networks that cannot be monitored.

In times like the one we are experiencing, in which teleworking is encouraged and, in some cases, the only possible solution, it is essential to have an eye for the applications in use on employees’ computers.

shadow IT

Benefits of Shadow IT

Despite the risks, shadow IT has its advantages. Getting IT approval can take time that employees can’t afford to waste.For many employees, approval is a productivity bottleneck, especially when they can get a fix in minutes.

Having IT behaving like an Orwellian “Big Brother” doesn’t always help productivity. Discerning cases of positive shadow IT can be the best compromise. Finding a middle ground can allow end users to research solutions that work best for them. This gives IT time to control user data and permissions for applications. If end users do not need to request new solutions, the IT department has been given time to focus on more critical tasks.

Proactive defense

Whatever the reason why shadow IT occurs, if the IT department is unaware of it, the risk of breach is high. What the corporate cyber security departments should do is implement automated traffic and behavior control systems.

The solution offered by a SOC as a Service is the most complete in this respect. It allows you to keep an eye on all the devices in the system and also monitor user behavior.

Thanks to the Nextgen SIEM and UEBA systems, in fact, the collection of usage data is easy and manageable in real time. The data collected is enriched and aggregated to give analysts the most complete view possible and allow rapid intervention. Meanwhile, the UEBA system checks that there are no anomalous behavior by users or suspicious outgoing data traffic.

Shadow IT, while not usually a malicious attack, is a practice that should be discouraged and, as it is risky, stopped in the bud.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS darkreading

RSS Full Disclosure

  • KL-001-2025-002: Checkmk NagVis Remote Code Execution February 4, 2025
    Posted by KoreLogic Disclosures via Fulldisclosure on Feb 04KL-001-2025-002: Checkmk NagVis Remote Code Execution Title: Checkmk NagVis Remote Code Execution Advisory ID: KL-001-2025-002 Publication Date: 2025-02-04 Publication URL: https://korelogic.com/Resources/Advisories/KL-001-2025-002.txt 1. Vulnerability Details      Affected Vendor: Checkmk      Affected Product: Checkmk/NagVis      Affected Version: Checkmk 2.3.0p2, NagVis 1.9.40      Platform: GNU/Linux      CWE...
  • KL-001-2025-001: Checkmk NagVis Reflected Cross-site Scripting February 4, 2025
    Posted by KoreLogic Disclosures via Fulldisclosure on Feb 04KL-001-2025-001: Checkmk NagVis Reflected Cross-site Scripting Title: Checkmk NagVis Reflected Cross-site Scripting Advisory ID: KL-001-2025-001 Publication Date: 2025-02-04 Publication URL: https://korelogic.com/Resources/Advisories/KL-001-2025-001.txt 1. Vulnerability Details      Affected Vendor: Checkmk      Affected Product: Checkmk/NagVis      Affected Version: Checkmk 2.3.0p2, NagVis 1.9.40      Platform: GNU/Linux...
  • APPLE-SA-01-30-2025-1 GarageBand 10.4.12 February 2, 2025
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Feb 01APPLE-SA-01-30-2025-1 GarageBand 10.4.12 GarageBand 10.4.12 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/121866. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. GarageBand Available for: macOS Sonoma 14.4 and later Impact: Processing a […]
  • Re: Text injection on https://www.google.com/sorry/index via ?q parameter (no XSS) February 2, 2025
    Posted by David Fifield on Feb 01I tested a few more times, and it appears the text injection has disappeared. These are timestamps when I tested, with offsets relative to the initial discovery. +0h 2025-01-28 03:00 initial discovery +5h 2025-01-28 08:19 ?q=EgtoZWxsbyB3b3JsZA works (https://archive.is/DD9xB) +14h 2025-01-28 17:31 ?q=EgtoZWxsbyB3b3JsZA works (no archive) +45h...
  • Xinet Elegant 6 Asset Lib Web UI 6.1.655 / SQL Injection / Exploit Update Python3 February 2, 2025
    Posted by hyp3rlinx on Feb 01Updated SQL Injection CVE-2019-19245 exploit for Python3. import requests,time,re,sys,argparse #NAPC Xinet Elegant 6 Asset Library v6.1.655 #Pre-Auth SQL Injection 0day Exploit #By hyp3rlinx #ApparitionSec #UPDATED: Jan 2024 for python3 #TODO: add SSL support #=============================== #This will dump tables, usernames and passwords in vulnerable versions #REQUIRE PARAMS:...
  • Quorum onQ OS - 6.0.0.5.2064 | Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) | CVE-2024-44449 January 30, 2025
    Posted by Shaikh Shahnawaz on Jan 29[+] Credits: Shahnawaz Shaikh, Security Researcher at Cybergate Defense LLC [+] twitter.com/_striv3r_ [Vendor] https://quorum.com/about/ [Product] Quorum onQ OS - 6.0.0.5.2064 Vulnerability Type] Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) [Affected Component] Login page get parameter 'msg' is vulnerable to Reflected Cross site scripting [CVE Reference] CVE-2024-44449 [Security Issue] Cross Site Scripting […]
  • Deepseek writes textbook insecure code in 2025-01-28 January 30, 2025
    Posted by Georgi Guninski on Jan 29Asking Deepseek on Jan 28 09:33:11 AM UTC 2025: Write a python CGI which takes as an argument string NAME and outputs "Hello"+NAME The Deepseek AI [3] returned: ==== name = form.getvalue('NAME', 'World') # Default to 'World' if NAME is not provided # Output the HTML response print(f"Hello, {name}!") […]
  • Text injection on https://www.google.com/sorry/index via ?q parameter (no XSS) January 30, 2025
    Posted by David Fifield on Jan 29The page https://www.google.com/sorry/index is familiar to Tor and VPN users. It is the one that says "Our systems have detected unusual traffic from your computer network. Please try your request again later." You will frequently be redirected to this page when using Tor Browser, when you do a search […]
  • APPLE-SA-01-27-2025-9 Safari 18.3 January 28, 2025
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Jan 27APPLE-SA-01-27-2025-9 Safari 18.3 Safari 18.3 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/122074. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. Passwords Available for: macOS Ventura and macOS Sonoma Impact: A malicious […]
  • APPLE-SA-01-27-2025-8 tvOS 18.3 January 28, 2025
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Jan 27APPLE-SA-01-27-2025-8 tvOS 18.3 tvOS 18.3 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/122072. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. AirPlay Available for: Apple TV HD and Apple TV 4K (all […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}